<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shane Sveller &#187; impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shanesveller.com/tag/impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shanesveller.com</link>
	<description>Somewhere between happy and total f**king wreck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>64-bit Windows?</title>
		<link>http://shanesveller.com/2008/07/07/64-bit-windows/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=64-bit-windows</link>
		<comments>http://shanesveller.com/2008/07/07/64-bit-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shanesveller.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found Vista x64 surprisingly usable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a chance with my time this weekend to try out Vista Ultimate x64, after acquiring a pair of 2GB sticks of DDR2-800 for my gaming desktop. I have to say, I haven&#8217;t had the chance to throw much at it and I wound up on a retro kick anyways, but Vista x64 seems just dandy on this machine.<br />
<span id="more-31"></span><br />
I&#8217;m a tad concerned, however, with the fact that Vista idled at ~35-39% memory usage. Sure, that doesn&#8217;t sound bad, till you work that that is more than 1400MB. Qualms? Yeah, I&#8217;ve got some. Mind you, this is excluding the so-called cache memory, I believe, not including. Compare that to, say, a viable 64-bit Ubuntu copy using like 130MB, and even WinXP sitting around a few hundred. After all, it&#8217;ll run on 256MB of RAM total, with some heavy swapping.</p>
<p>On the other hand, using 64-bit Vista with SP1, I noticed no appreciable slowdowns with my games, but I have no hard numbers so it&#8217;s all subjective. Plus, I was playing a DX10 game I hadn&#8217;t played in a long while, or ever on Vista. Hellgate London, if you&#8217;re curious. However, it&#8217;s quite pretty on DX10, and I was running with maxed settings except AA was on &#8220;Medium&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also loaded up the Orange Pack along with some other non-graphically-impressive games I had a hankering for, including Space Empires IV &amp; V, and Outpost 2, of all things. A Windows 95 game, FFS!</p>
<p>I think some of the noticeable slowdown here and there on HGL and the Steam games was a harddrive bottleneck. Vista is loaded on my old SATA1.5 120GB. If and when I move it to the new-ish 320GB SATA3 from WestDig, I think games will show themselves to be pretty snappy with 4GB to play with.</p>
<p>Definitely a leap from 32-bit. Only 2.5GB available after XP accounts for my SLI 512MB vidcards. Alt-tabbing on Vista was very quick, much faster than 32-bit XP.</p>
<p>Still playing with the WMP11/Media Center integration with my 360.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to note that this a legit copy of Vista Ultimate, I have my own (32-bit) copy purchased at a local shop for a reasonable sum. I still need to order my own 64-bit DVD from Microsoft, which they offer as a courtesy for a shipping fee. But I&#8217;m using my own CD key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shanesveller.com/2008/07/07/64-bit-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
